-------------------------------------------
I nearly saw a girl run down yesterday on my way down 9th Street in D.C. She was booking along in heavy traffic. I made room to let her by on the right. Cars were moving at about 15, she was doing maybe 20. By the odd happenstance of lights, she wound up a little ways in front of me when the road opened up. An asshole in a Jetta gassed it to get past her and went to turn right in front of her, cutting her off. She hollered and braked hard, he just stopped and sat there blocking her. Had anything happened, I was definitely stopping to stick around and be a witness for the cops. It was a bullshit maneuver on his part but what you'd expect.
Speaking of bullshit maneuvers... check out the film of a Miami-Dade bus driver running down a cyclist that is posted up over at Drunk Cyclist. But for the grace of God, there go I...
-------------------------------------------
Now here's something that's pretty funny, and it may be a sign of (1) the apocalypse; (2) that we should all stop what we're doing and start drinking, hard. It's Ted Nugent speaking sense, more or less, about energy policy. It's in garbled, jacked up TedSpeak, but I think most of what he says is correct. Y'know, once you translate it into Englishy. Ted's thesis:
When gas prices go up, Americans condemn big oil for making profits. When catastrophes happen, such as the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Americans demand that big oil be severely fined, demand more government oversight of the industry by a proven incompetent Fedzilla and demand that more safety features be implemented to prevent another oil spill while expecting gas prices to stay low.That sounds right... we want plentiful, low cost fuel, on a massive scale beyond the Fed's capability to regulate, and we want no environmental impact. I think that sums up the voters' sentiments about national energy policy pretty neatly. Ted goes on to more or less articulate a bunch of implications of that belief system, and why it isn't rational, in his editorial. He's a crazy sumbitch, but in his own way he speaks the truth as he sees it. I like him for that. And for the gnarliest 70's heavy rock anthem, Stranglehold.
That's a great song if you're climbing some long hills - like up at Thurmont. Good rhythm you can grind to, or double up on and tap a fast cadence. And I know this is midweek and you aren't used to music here right now, but I can't help myself:
"When in doubt, I whip it out, got me a rock 'n' roll band it's a free for all!" Yeah, Ted may be crazy but dang, he played some good music. Just as time would pardon Yeats because he wrote well, time will also pardon Nugent of his nuttiness because he gave us some great music.
-------------------------------------------
Former University of Maryland student / porn star goes on killing spree... Terps representin!
-------------------------------------------
In the wake of Cadel Evans covering himself in glory yet again, this time at the Giro ("I didn't punch that doggie..."), Ritte van Vlaanderen's excellent summary of Cadel bears further notice. Please click through.
2 comments:
Used to really like the Nuge...remember me and my buddies jamming out to Scream Dream back in the lat 70s. He's turned into such a total douche in his old age, though.
I like how the same guy who sang "Journey to the Center of the Mind" with the Amboy Dukes now claims that he's never done illegal drugs, and has advocated the Death Penalty for drug users/dealers.
Clearly a douche...
Thanks,
Burt
>>>Clearly a douche...
Yeah, well, he fails the libertarian purity test for sure, but I appreciate his willingness to take a stand on the first couple of amendments in the Bill of Rights, particularly when most people in his line of work just strike a pose about the First, then knuckle under, and ignore the Second completely. Cf. Frank Zappa. It's kind of how I feel about a couple of the big civil liberties groups - their copy of the Constitution appears to lack the Second, Tenth, Eleventh, and parts of the Fifth Amendment - but if you really believe individual rights sometimes it pays to be pragmatic and break things down to discrete questions and count noses on each question individually. You get more votes that way, usually.
Post a Comment